Loose Change 2nd Edition (Full)

Back


Loose Change is an internet film written and directed by Dylan Avery, produced by Korey Rowe with researcher Jason Bermas. The film presents a 9/11 conspiracy theory to set forth the claim that elements within the United States government planned and executed the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. The film was released through the creators' company, Louder than Words, and received wide attention after Loose Change 2nd Edition was featured on a Binghamton, New York local FOX affiliate, WICZ-TV (FOX 40).[1] It is one of the most watched films on the Internet, with over 10 million viewers in 2006.[2]

The accuracy and fairness of Loose Change has been disputed by Popular Mechanics, media outlets and independent researchers. On September 11, 2006 Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas appeared on "Democracy Now! the War and Peace Report", to debate James Meigs and David Dunbar,[3] two editors of Popular Mechanics and the book Debunking 9/11 Myths.[4] The film has been edited and re-released in a second edition, then recut again removing some of the inaccuracies that were in previous editions. A further "final cut" version was originally planned for release on September 11 2006, but was delayed and is now pushed back to February or March 2007.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: February 15, 2007 at 8:15 pm
Author: TheStraight911Truth

Length: 01:29:22
Rating: 4.62
Views: 681786

Tags: Loose Change 911 9/11

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
jay123jd (December 1, 2008 at 8:29 pm)
Tard cannot see the forest for the trees.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 2008 at 3:16 pm)
Watch as the truther censor marks down posts that disagree with his insane theories.
So much for free speech, when truthers are around.
He is desperately trying to mark these posts as spam, in order to have posters who disagree with him removed by youtube.
Its an admission of defeat, the truth movement dont like their theories questioned.
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 2008 at 2:37 pm)
flight77(dot)info has a list of the videos, only one shows the actual impact.
jesperdepesper (November 30, 2008 at 2:22 pm)
where do the pictures of the explosion at the pentagon come from
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 2008 at 11:34 am)
"Americans cant take their president to court while he is still in office."

So you have a couple of months to get your evidence together.
Are you doing that?
What law firm are you using?
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 2008 at 10:51 am)
"if president Bush was charged with murder, would you agree he should testify by himself, under oath, with visual recording, audio recording, and a written transcript available to the public?"

Yes.
But he hasnt been charged with murder and no evidence has been submitted to any prosecution either.
Thats the whole point.
When are you intending to do this?
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 2008 at 5:33 am)
Personally I cant wait to see a troofer case go to court.
It will be comedy gold.
Maybe you could bring up your "no planes" evidence izzy.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
TruthersAreRetarded (November 30, 2008 at 5:31 am)
"The governments account of 911 is full of lies therefore it defines itself as guilty demeanor. That is admissable as evidence."

Then you will have no problem pointing out these lies will you?
Also, when are you planning on bringing a case to court?
All I see is whining on youtube and dead troofer sites.
Surely if you have some evidence about 9/11 being an inside job, then you would be taking this to court?
bIZAROsPRMN11 (November 30, 2008 at 10:23 am)
TruthersAreRetarded,
"you will have no problem pointing out these lies ...
when are you planning on bringing a case to court?"
a fallacy: it does not necessarily follow that you would recognize a lie.
if president Bush was charged with murder, would you agree he should testify by himself, under oath, with visual recording, audio recording, and a written transcript available to the public?
failure of critical thinking = failure of justice system.
delicato024 (November 30, 2008 at 10:52 am)
Americans cant take their president to court while he is still in office.