ACLU Challenges Jeppesen Dataplan and CIA Rendition
BackFrom aclu.org/rendition: The ACLU filed a federal lawsuit against Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., a subsidiary of Boeing Company, on behalf of three victims of the U.S. government's unlawful "extraordinary rendition" program. The lawsuit charges that Jeppesen knowingly provided direct flight services to the CIA that enabled the clandestine transportation of Binyam Mohamed, Abou Elkassim Britel and Ahmed Agiza to secret overseas locations where they were subjected to torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: May 30, 2007 at 4:14 pm
Author: acluvideos
Length: 00:09:51
Rating: 4.75
Views: 11369
Tags: Rendition ACLU CIA Jeppesen Dataplan San Jose torture detention Boeing prison Guantanamo Khaled El-Masri
Video Comments:
djFrend (November 20, 2008 at 8:53 pm)
What disgusting perversions the US government is capable of. Sort em out Obama.
Aaberg123 (November 11, 2008 at 10:58 pm)
"an extraordinary rendition program is necessary for the extraordinary circumstances we live in today."
Ahh, just like Hitler needed the KZ camps due to the extraordinary circumstance of having Jews living in his country. He saw them as a threat to Germany.
Does the term "slippery slope" mean anything to you?
Ahh, just like Hitler needed the KZ camps due to the extraordinary circumstance of having Jews living in his country. He saw them as a threat to Germany.
Does the term "slippery slope" mean anything to you?
notonyourlifewillit (November 3, 2008 at 1:06 pm)
ALIEN AGENDA THEY CAN REPLACE,U YOU GET KIDNAPPED AND NO ONE KNOWS YOUR MISSING, THERE ARE ION ACCELERATORS ON OUR NEW COURT HOUSES LIKE THE MARK O HATFIELD BUILDING IN PORTLAND OR.IDENTICAL TO FERMI LAB IN CHICAGO, GOOGLE EARTH PUT IN MARK O HATFIELD BUILDING 3RD AND SALMON SW.TAKE A LOOK AT THE TECHNOLOGY ON THE ROOF OF THIS BUILDING, TRY AND CAPTURE IMAGES OF THIS BUILDING AND SEND IT TO ANYBODY, YOU WONT BE ABLE TO. THESE BUILDINGS ARE PORTALS, TROJAN HORSES YOU GET REPLACED AND END UPinjail
CommanderUTube (October 20, 2008 at 3:23 am)
In the name of national security,a security apparatus could be given blanket power to do anything without accountability to society.
The danger is that what if perverts have infiltrated such an agency and start to perpetuate a program to abuse people for the sake of it.
It could happened to anyone.
In the last days of the old Roman Empire,the Praetorian Guards in Rome did just that and held the Emperor and families captive.
What happens if CIA is infiltrated? It is too horrible to...
The danger is that what if perverts have infiltrated such an agency and start to perpetuate a program to abuse people for the sake of it.
It could happened to anyone.
In the last days of the old Roman Empire,the Praetorian Guards in Rome did just that and held the Emperor and families captive.
What happens if CIA is infiltrated? It is too horrible to...
Rockguitarnow (August 28, 2008 at 11:11 pm)
Anyone obstructing or intefering with federal lawsuit work is committing a federal offense and faces five years in federal prison. This includes any kind of harassment, the blocking or delaying of emails, interfering with internet service or computer operation, spreading slander or defamation to impede the lawsuit investigation or lawsuit work, and similar.
ChemicalAlarm (July 26, 2008 at 10:56 pm)
I've seen him do it on other ACLU vids, it's called "slagging": Just making the same disparaging complaints whether relevant or not.
y760nitro (July 16, 2008 at 1:12 pm)
stupid idiots
ACLU: We misread US v Miller, and we're sticking by our incorrect interpretation of the 2nd Amendment.
Excerpt:
The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller.
ACLU: We misread US v Miller, and we're sticking by our incorrect interpretation of the 2nd Amendment.
Excerpt:
The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller.
ChemicalAlarm (July 26, 2008 at 10:52 pm)
Quit slagging, if it's not relevant, it doesn't belong here as a comment.
massspectrician (June 19, 2008 at 3:46 pm)
Jeppesen provided auxiliary services with knowledge of acts these services supported. I, for one, have a problem with people profiting (with my tax dollars) from such deplorable acts aimed at marginalizing due process of law conventions. Legally, I think the ACLU will need to show that Jeppesen knew what the CIA was doing to be compromised.
antiwar100 (April 13, 2008 at 8:22 pm)
Ok, I am a legal idiot, but why can't the ACLU, or the grievanced individuals sue the U.S. government? Isn't going after Jeppesen, like going after a delivery boy for the Mafia?
- Soundbiters | Comment on Political Video
-
Tags:
Politics Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Chris Dodd John Edwards Mike Gravel Dennis Kucinich Barack Obama Bill Richardson Sam Brownback Rudy Giuliani Mike Huckabee Duncan Hunter John McCain Ron Paul Mitt Romney Tom Tancredo Tommy Thompson Fred Thompson Rush Limbaugh Mark Levin Laura Ingraham Sean Hannity Monica Crowley Bob Grant Bill O'Reilly Michael Medved Glenn Beck G. Gordon Liddy Matt Drudge Bill Bennett Neal Boortz Alan Colmes Al Sharpton Randi Rhodes Hugh Hewitt Al Franken Republican Democrat Libertarian George Bush Political Scandal
-