ABORTION - THE SILENT SCREAM #1 / Part 1 / 01 / One / Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video
BackABORTION - THE SILENT SCREAM #1 (with permission from APF). Republished with Permission from Roy Tidwell of American Portrait Films as long as the following credits are shown:
VHS/DVDs Available
American Portrait Films
Call 1-800-736-4567
www.amport.com
This has been performed as asked. This video is perfectly legal.
The Silent Scream Part 1 - Abortion as Infanticide
Dr. Bernard Nathanson's classic video that shocked the world. He explains the procedure of a suction abortion, followed by an actual first trimester abortion as seen through ultrasound. The viewer can see the child's pathetic attempts to escape the suction curette as her heart rate doubles, and a "silent scream" as her body is torn apart. A great tool to help people see why abortion is murder. The most important video on abortion ever made. This video changed opinion on abortion to many people.
Introduction by Dr. Bernard Nathanson, host. Describes the technology of ultrasound and how, for the first time ever, we can actually see inside the womb. Dr. Nathanson further describes the ultrasound technique and shows examples of babies in the womb. Three-dimensional depiction of the developing fetus, from 4 weeks through 28 weeks. Display and usage of the abortionists' tools, plus video of an abortionist performing a suction abortion. Dr. Nathanson discusses the abortionist who agreed to allow this abortion to be filmed with ultrasound. The abortionist was quite skilled, having performed more than 10,000 abortions. We discover that the resulting ultrasound of his abortion so appalled him that he never again performed another abortion. The clip begins with an ultrasound of the fetus (girl) who is about to be aborted. The girl is moving in the womb; displays a heartbeat of 140 per minute; and is at times sucking her thumb. As the abortionist's suction tip begins to invade the womb, the child rears and moves violently in an attempt to avoid the instrument. Her mouth is visibly open in a "silent scream." The child's heart rate speeds up dramatically (to 200 beats per minute) as she senses aggression. She moves violently away in a pathetic attempt to escape the instrument. The abortionist's suction tip begins to rip the baby's limbs from its body, ultimately leaving only her head in the uterus (too large to be pulled from the uterus in one piece). The abortionist attempts to crush her head with his forceps, allowing it to be removed. In an effort to "dehumanize" the procedure, the abortionist and anesthesiologist refer to the baby's head as "number 1." The abortionist crushes "number 1" with the forceps and removes it from the uterus. Abortion statistics are revealed, as well as who benefits from the enormously lucrative industry that has developed. Clinics are now franchised, and there is ample evidence that many are controlled by organized crime. Women are victims, too. They haven't been told about the true nature of the unborn child or the facts about abortion procedures. Their wombs have been perforated, infected, destroyed, and sterilized. All as a result of an operation about which they they have had no true knowledge. Films like this must be made part of "informed consent." NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League) and Planned Parenthood are accused of a conspiracy of silence, of keeping women in the dark about the reality of abortion. Finally, Dr. Nathanson discusses his credentials. He is a former abortionist, having been the director of the largest clinic in the Western world.
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: December 29, 2006 at 1:37 am
Author: rosaryfilms
Length: 00:05:24
Rating: 3.82
Views: 1167355
Tags: abortion pro-choice prochoice pro-life prolife abortions life anti-abortion pregnancy pregnant pro choice silent scream
Video Comments:
lifeofthe6 (December 1, 2008 at 4:33 pm)
Comment number 9500.
nessunopassato (November 30, 2008 at 9:48 pm)
then I guess there is a new front on abortion issue...middle, the strive for regulation rather the pro-choice movement of absolute legal abortion, which was the thrive of 73 and still is its purpose today
snipzor (November 30, 2008 at 7:25 pm)
I know how you feel about this, I really do, I myself am somewhat torn on the psychological affects that abortion can have on the woman; so I'm not entirely pro-abortion in that sense.
But still, when the fetus can neither think or understand anything (Conscious/Subconscious/No Conscious). Below vegetation. The fetus is a hollow shell of congregated cells, I know it is depressing, but that's just the way it is.
But still, when the fetus can neither think or understand anything (Conscious/Subconscious/No Conscious). Below vegetation. The fetus is a hollow shell of congregated cells, I know it is depressing, but that's just the way it is.
nessunopassato (November 30, 2008 at 5:07 pm)
yea well, my point still stands, a fetus is conscious not unconscious unless its passed out due to lack of air (like when umbilical cord is wraped around the neck, or some thing chemical from the mother like drugs).what you mention is the sub-conscious and not uconscious.
snipzor (November 30, 2008 at 5:01 pm)
Not necessarily. Sub-consciously is rare in a fetus. When i say rare, it usually occurs in early birth fetus'.
It isn't just unconsciousness, but t is also independent organ function which only occurs minutes after the birth.
It isn't just unconsciousness, but t is also independent organ function which only occurs minutes after the birth.
nessunopassato (November 30, 2008 at 4:57 pm)
then its sub-consciously not unconsiously, your still awake and still have the ability (similar to a baby) to move. that happens with everyone and is of different readings than the suposed conscious
snipzor (November 30, 2008 at 4:54 pm)
I twitch when people get to close to me, does it mean I am doing it consciously? Nope, I can't even stop it. Same thing (Not actually a joke, brain activity for consciousness never occurs when I twitch, or when a fetus does something).
nessunopassato (November 30, 2008 at 4:49 pm)
conscous vs non-conscious, one reacts with the enviroment while the other is challenged or restricted this right. neither however are dead, nor non living. also, why would the baby try to remove its self away from death while the coma patient is unable to move? because there is a difference. the baby moves within the stomach, you aware of that? how is a coma patient able to move? the baby doesnt float randomly.
geordiemummy (November 30, 2008 at 3:55 am)
so wot about these girls and women that are raped resulting in pregnancy? are u still against abortion then? think real hard before you open your mouths
snipzor (November 29, 2008 at 10:52 pm)
Being here to shock everyone, what if I were here to tell you that even in the third trimester, the developing fetus (With an emphasis on developing) has no conscious understanding of anything. For example, let's take a coma victim. During a coma, the patient will sometimes blink or twitch, but in no way is that person conscious of their surroundings or their actions.
Now what this "Doctor" fails to do is provide any brainwave scans. There is something missing that a conscious individual has.
Now what this "Doctor" fails to do is provide any brainwave scans. There is something missing that a conscious individual has.
- Soundbiters | Comment on Political Video
-
Tags:
Politics Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Chris Dodd John Edwards Mike Gravel Dennis Kucinich Barack Obama Bill Richardson Sam Brownback Rudy Giuliani Mike Huckabee Duncan Hunter John McCain Ron Paul Mitt Romney Tom Tancredo Tommy Thompson Fred Thompson Rush Limbaugh Mark Levin Laura Ingraham Sean Hannity Monica Crowley Bob Grant Bill O'Reilly Michael Medved Glenn Beck G. Gordon Liddy Matt Drudge Bill Bennett Neal Boortz Alan Colmes Al Sharpton Randi Rhodes Hugh Hewitt Al Franken Republican Democrat Libertarian George Bush Political Scandal
-