Richard Dawkins on Alan Colmes Pt. 3

Back


Look here for parts 1 and 2

Part 1


Part 2


Alan Colmes interviewed Richard Dawkins on his FOX radio show.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: June 4, 2007 at 1:01 am
Author: nickw012

Length: 00:07:44
Rating: 4.94
Views: 22987

Tags: richard dawkins alan colmes hannity fox news atheists atheism christians christianity muslims islam sex drugs religion

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
zabrak999 (October 7, 2008 at 1:25 am)
yeah ok but that's not on fox news. I'm talking about on his show. Hannity is obviously the overpowering figure, sadly.
qwertyzealot (October 7, 2008 at 1:24 am)
Obviously I think Dawkins has better arguments and certainly isn't soft; and still shouldn't be a target for the 'hurt feelings card'.

But I wouldn't say Alan was SOFT considering he said: "would you go around raping and killing people if there was no God?" and: "...is that what you wanna do?" and : "Are you suggesting that if there were no God you'd kill your neighbour?" and finally "but you're not answering my question!"
MyGodMoreGooder (October 4, 2008 at 4:57 am)
my god is more gooder than your god
Omid45 (September 30, 2008 at 7:05 am)
bottom line is there is no evidence for god, and for some, and all the evidence against him. Thus, for somebody to assert that a natural being, (not even a personal god) exists for sure with no doubt, you should really see a doctor, or jump off a building.
assblaster17 (September 19, 2008 at 2:04 am)
"Have you prayed and felt the holy spirit?"

"Yeah when I was about 12."

Fucking hilarious.
vaioati (September 16, 2008 at 9:44 am)
^ Don't misjudge Alan Colmes because he's on the same show as Hannity. Hannity is a total nut, Colmes is there to try and balance the show.
zabrak999 (September 22, 2008 at 6:17 pm)
Right but he does a bad job at doing it. Look I like Alan Colmes but he's wayyyy too soft. We need to replace him with a liberal that is as outspoken as Hannity, it's unfortunate, but we do.
ironfistphong (September 13, 2008 at 10:30 pm)
Shit God never stopped any of those catholic priests from molesting young boys or selling cocaine or whatever else they do (and you KNOW they do all sorts of other things too). It should be obvious that being religious doesn't even come close to guaranteeing that you will be moral and law abiding.
septigus3 (September 6, 2008 at 8:25 pm)
I can't believe that they goaded that man in to saying weather he would rape or not on the basis of the existence or non existence of god. He was merely appealing to the moral law which can so far can only be satisfactorily explained by an objective law giver. It was a cheap shot to try to personalise the subject to the man himself. They clearly caught him off guard and exasperated him by making it look as if he was only speaking for himself.
Hollander113 (August 29, 2008 at 7:31 pm)
Twice it came up so I thought I'd say a word about it. To suggest that our bodies are perfect is so ludicrous. Not only in the fact that if we are so perfect why are there Mongols. But also you can just look at every Male on the planet, Why do we have nipples?...