Keith Olbermann Names Michael Medved "World's Worst"

Back


Olbermann is a lightweight and misrepresents Michael Medved's Townhall.com column on slavery. Read it here:

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: October 1, 2007 at 9:36 pm
Author: TownhallVideos

Length: 00:02:20
Rating: 3.61
Views: 8646

Tags: keith olbermann michael medved townhall.com townhall defend slavery six inconvenient truths column MSNBC world's worst

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
1squalo7 (November 15, 2008 at 11:47 pm)
medved is a hypocrit and the biggest liar
Romulus2009 (November 7, 2008 at 5:31 pm)
Medved is a complete moron and should stick to reviewing movies.

BEFORE the election, Medved had a major hard-on for Gov. Sarah Palin - strong enough to drive nails into concrete.

He spewed fear and hate mongering for all the citizens of the greatest country Gods green Earth give us a break.

AFTER the election, Medved does a 180 and begins to find a place for his head up Obamas butt. Medved is arrogant, irrelevant and a political shill no longer worth listening to.
theGoldenAgeOfBoredo (November 15, 2008 at 7:09 pm)
no,dont even let him review movies!
did you see his review on REDACTED?

sorry for this,but hes a fucking C-U-N-T
wikitdevil (November 4, 2008 at 4:27 pm)
Michael was better reviewing movies then being made King Shmuck of Politics. What an uptight , anal , repressed ,scared little jerk. We already have Rush and O'really. He must be trying to get some of those ignorant conservative neo-con dollars. He is an embarrassment to white men like me and men in general. Nobody played with this guy when he was little. it's obvious.
I'll be sure in the future to fact check this overpaid morons muck and call him on it.
GstateBALLER925 (October 10, 2008 at 12:47 am)
hey moron, he gets higher ratings than majority of the people in the media so get your facts straight before you lie out of your ass.
codered003 (October 4, 2008 at 9:18 am)
at least on fox news they show both sides... even if they are more conservitive... they still have liberal comentators on there program.

Keith would never have a conservitive analist on his program.

ALL HE DOES IS JUDGE PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT VIEWS THAN HIM AND DISTORTS CONSERVATIVE INFORMATION!

not fair at all. why watch him
A0114 (October 6, 2008 at 10:17 pm)
Why would he have a 'conservitive analist' on his program?
rhettrongun (October 24, 2008 at 9:43 pm)
Maybe so they could defend some of these accusations. Otherwise he get's to just sit there and blare anything and everything that he can take out of context. Take this slavery defense crap that he pins on Medved. He refused to actually talk to Michael Medved about what was said on countdown. The only thing that keeps Medved from suing him for libel is the NY Times Vs Sullivan court case. Medved is a public figure, so apparently Keith can make up whatever he wants about him.
postprandialzen (October 30, 2008 at 6:30 am)
Yeah really, conservitive analists like Larry Craig and Ted Haggard are far, far too busy snooping around restrooms and shady parks to be on some one-sided loony conspiratorial syndicated news program.
drmeithos (October 4, 2008 at 1:27 am)
congrats medved. that slob keith olbermann cant keep a show together, or his 10 viewers. he cant get actual proof about medved's comments. he's sputtering. he trying to get dirt on anyone in the republican party.