Fraud claims emerge in US presidential race

Back


A U.S. election watchdog claims to have spotted discrepancies between machine and manually counted ballots in the New Hampshire primary election. New Hampshire officials have agreed to do a manual recount.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: January 14, 2008 at 4:12 am
Author: RussiaToday

Length: 00:03:03
Rating: 4.95
Views: 30034

Tags: US presidential race fraud New Hampshire primary discrepancies manual recount

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
yahoovisitor (September 12, 2008 at 1:32 pm)
Bush of Republican Party is at his best to have McCain succeed in the coming elections. Barak Obama of the Democrat party is already ahead as regards convincing. But the irony is that Pakistan is being made the test lab for this purpose. As Bush having hardly 50 days left for the campaign, wants someone like Osama or any of his team members dead or alive to win the US Presidential elections. They have no idea where he is but Pakistan is being constantly bombed & destroyed to win US elections.
stopglobalswarming (August 3, 2008 at 10:34 pm)
RON PAUL! The f'rs in NH threw away and hid Ron Paul votes.

Diebold is bullshit.
whtshdw02 (April 28, 2008 at 8:32 pm)
no, McCain. its simple, he wants more war. so this is why he will win.
chenteyo (March 30, 2008 at 9:55 am)
The reporter is hot!
americaflagpin (March 12, 2008 at 10:21 pm)
or,is this rumor to hurt one's campaign.
americaflagpin (March 12, 2008 at 10:05 pm)
Reported that Fl and Mich may have a do over.Hillary is right.She said the people of New York and MIch should have their votes counts.She also said tonight that a solution is that keep the votes or do a do-over in Fl and Mich. Obama said well.......we have to think about what kind of solution.well be best.How better can it get then keep what votes or do a do-over.I'm being to wonder about this race,are our votes really count?
flameded (March 7, 2008 at 1:01 pm)
were f'd.
PeteTheBossRoss (February 8, 2008 at 11:12 am)
Yes voter fraud is a potentially big problem,but asserting the problem is widespread simply because the internet is buzzing about it is simply absurd. Internet media, particularly bloggers are an extremely unreliable source for media.They have no concern for accountability and can say whatever they want with out consequence, with or with out evidence.The internet community relies mostly on bias opinions, while the network news is obligated to report only cold facts (though not always perfectly).
seventhsun11422 (February 18, 2008 at 3:33 am)
So, by your assumption the "News" reporting, that Ron Paul is "crazy" is a cold fact...
O.. K..
ShootBlueHelmets (September 20, 2008 at 8:44 pm)
"...an extremely unreliable source for media.They have no concern for accountability and can say whatever they want with out consequence, with or with out evidence." Thanks, I think you just about described the sane person's view on mainstream media sources.