Ron Paul Courageously Speaks the Truth

Back


Congressman Ron Paul in the GOP presidential debate held in South Carolina (May '07).

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: May 20, 2007 at 9:26 pm
Author: RonPaul2008dotcom

Length: 00:13:41
Rating: 4.74
Views: 1219026

Tags: Ron Paul Rudy Giuliani terrorism 9-11 republican debate campaign RonPaul2008 election Koger Center USC South Carolina

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
NoBailout4Banksters (December 5, 2008 at 5:58 am)
There are scientists on BOTH sides of the global warning Scare Tactic but you choose to believe on one side only.

"Switch to Gold, the Fed WILL Fold"

TIME Magazine has left off Ron Paul as "Person of the Year" even though he received the most comments on their YouTube channel.

It is time to BOYCOTT TIME Magazine.
NoBailout4Banksters (December 5, 2008 at 5:56 am)
Democrats are responsible for more wars and police actions then Republicans are. Check history.

As for global warming it is mostly a cycle of the weather. Check your history on that as well.

Man adds a very small amount to the global warming problem. Nature causes the majority of it such as volcanoes. The government is using global warming as another Scare Tactic like 'War on Drugs", "war on Terrorism" and war on anything else they may be wanting to use to BRAINWASH the sleeping SHEEPLE.
Starteller (December 5, 2008 at 1:49 am)
If we disclose the hidden UFOs technologies we solved all our Energy, Environmental and Economic problems for the ENTIRE planet.

Wake-up people all our government are traitors.

We need to charge them for High Treason and Crimes against Humanity before it's too late.
ReduceGHGs (December 4, 2008 at 10:26 pm)
No, I certainly don't think RP is stupid. I think some of his approaches governing in general are stupid as well as his skeptical view on global warming.

The republicans were a "moronic" crew that's for sure. (RP is a Libertarian that hid among them.) But with the right marketing and propaganda that just doesn't seem to matter. We got shrub, TWICE! What a terrible all too many made. Do they feel at all responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands? I think they should.
screwmachine6 (December 4, 2008 at 9:34 pm)
8:10-8:30

6:52-7:02

ROFLMAO >>> 13:23-13:30...
(I love how RP turns away and then comes back with "We gave him the gas!")
braviet (December 4, 2008 at 9:18 pm)
u may disagree with ron paul philosophy, but don't say he's stupid. For god sake, he makes the other republican canditates look like total morons.
ReduceGHGs (December 4, 2008 at 8:46 pm)
The global warming crisis here and the public is insisting on meaningful policy changes. But some like RP and Palin are masked skeptics. With every historically reliable scientific institution agreeing that humans are warming the climate you'd think they'd accept the science. RP would rather abolish the EPA and let "The Market" deal with it. This kind of backward rather than forward thinking, like w/cheney's, needs to end!
ReduceGHGs (December 4, 2008 at 7:54 pm)
Now, come on; purpose of an introduction? Had that been to your favor you'd be crowing about it. Skip ahead to something that agrees with your contention? Huh?

Yes, RP has been talking about his Libertarian approach for some time. This year he cloaked himself as a Republican. Again, hes NOT what we need.

No, I'm no law expert but do you mean to imply that those not following RP's philosophy are unlawful?

Soc.Sec., EPA, FDA, Public Land.
RP favors dumping all. True and ridiculous!
TexasGuy09 (December 4, 2008 at 7:51 pm)
poor Ron Paul, the republican party rejected him due to him being to truthful and constitutonal, something that both political parties know nothing of. Ron Paul ftw
Kyocus (December 4, 2008 at 7:36 pm)
A preamble is not law. Its an introduction, the lawfull portions of the constitution follow JUST after they finish ... do ordain and establish this constituion for the United States of America. Skip ahead a bit.
You may call it the "same old rhetoric", but Ron Paul has been advocating this rhetoric for decades. The misteak you make is labeling it as simply rhetoric. What Ron Paul advocates is what he believes in and stands by. You know more then him about constitutional law Im sure.