Noam Chomsky vs. William F. Buckley Debate : Part 1 of 2

Back


From 1969, but still very relavent today.

Noam Chomsky debates William F. Buckley.

Part 2 is here


Who is Noam Chomsky?


Who is William F. Buckley?


Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: April 26, 2006 at 3:35 pm
Author: Proverbs13i16

Length: 00:10:29
Rating: 4.90
Views: 479024

Tags: Noam Chomsky Buckley debate 1969 terrorism terrorist Iraq Bush

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
roofryder23 (December 3, 2008 at 12:18 pm)
Buckley - "the discussion is whether or not there is such a thing as relatively disinterested international interference, it seems to me America's record is rather good, we went through an imperialist phase, we pulled out of it faster than any country in the history of civilization.."

Chomsky - "no I think we're very deeply entrenched"

This was in 1969, it seems that Chomsky turned out to be more or less correct, at least on this issue.
metyzermanfan19 (December 3, 2008 at 11:29 pm)
Absolutely
bullonparade129 (December 3, 2008 at 9:05 am)
wfb reminds me of bill o'reilly trys not to let him makes his points by being rude and not letting him finish his statements... phil donahue said correctly loud is doesn't mean your right
MaelMan82 (December 2, 2008 at 6:14 am)
WFB obviously spends time on how he appears to peoples with facial expressions and how he speaks. It's almost laughable how he's talking to Chomski.
ludachris475 (November 29, 2008 at 6:34 pm)
It was not until the 17th century that homos were used purely as ballasts to be shot from British cannons to sink Spanish galleons in Antigua. Such a practice was common among Her Majesty's admiralty to inhibit mercantile sodomy and other wanton indulgences of the crotch. This became the standard of all vessels in Her Majesty's merchant fleet in the Antilles and elsewhere among regular vessels and persons of inferior rank, to regiment men from perpetual sodomy and mutiny of the groin.
riethc (November 30, 2008 at 1:46 am)
LoL

I see what you're doing... and I like it!
americannapalm (November 29, 2008 at 4:47 pm)
i love the illusion of civility some try to impress on others
chifour66 (November 29, 2008 at 4:04 am)
Lovely!

Buckley gives Chomsky the rope and lets him hang himself. He does a fantastic job of blathering with no real meaning. If I were WFB, I would had a hard time not stabbing him in the eye with his ever present pencil.
americannapalm (November 29, 2008 at 4:46 pm)
i think some easily mistake his points for blathering because he is trying to lay out his case in context which for some....it just takes too much thinking power to follow along...wfb seems a little out of his league and you can tell by the facial reactions he gives chomsky...and the comment about punching his goddamn face in...which isn't that far from the remark you made...i guess thats what we get for actually trying to make sense to people too obtuse to think
MaelMan82 (December 2, 2008 at 6:11 am)
very well said my friend.