JFK Zapruder analysis

Back


Proof the fatal bullet came from BEHIND.

Warning!!

===

Any comments saying that the driver is holding a gun will be removed!
Not because I'm covering up as part of the consperacy, but because I own stocks in Dapper Dan, the gel the co driver is wearing in his hair.

===

Warning!!

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: September 10, 2006 at 12:06 pm
Author: sbrenn

Length: 00:02:24
Rating: 3.90
Views: 228042

Tags: JFK Zapruder grassy knoll picket fence oswald warren conspiracy kennedy assassination

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
curtjester1 (December 5, 2008 at 1:31 am)
The film is a fake. See The Great Zapruder Film Hoax by book or online book. Witnesses said there was no violent thrusting to the back and to the left. The blob you saw for a wound was painted on. Many saw the blowout of the back of the head and shot from the front, and brain matter plastered on limo back, motorcylists and trailing vehicle, and on the clothes of everyone. They got rid of all that. That's why they had to confiscated key photos and films right after.
KVASEY (December 5, 2008 at 12:54 am)
Undisputed: Oswald got his job at the depository before the route was announced, left the scene immediately, hailed a taxi for transportation & was found armed hiding in a theater (he had absolutely no predetermined escape plan.) No mastermind would have orchestrated this or used someone like Oswald. You wouldnt want one of your shooters to be employed in the snipers nest because he couldnt disappear forever without any links. The mastermind-behind-the-assassination theory is irrational.
sbrenn (December 4, 2008 at 11:30 pm)
What is this nonsense about those people walking backwards. If they didn't step back on the sidewalk they would be run over by the motorcade.
Are you people that stupid? Jeeezz...
bigdonbowski (December 4, 2008 at 10:45 pm)
The film is fake, motion blur and aspect ratios do not match from frame to frame, any fool can see it
grassyknollkiller (December 4, 2008 at 9:46 pm)
The film is a fraud. People dont walk backwards over the curb from the street with long strides.
The film is a fraud. Why would the CIA & FBI prevent it from being released for many years? To edit out the obvious conspiracy. This film wasnt even supposed to see public daylight. If something walks like a duck, acts like a duck & sounds like a duck, the chances are... it's a duck i.e. the film is a fraud.
Of course, birdbrains like anthonydwalsh believe whatever govt tells him to believe.
DemonSlayer4U (December 4, 2008 at 7:34 pm)
Hard to all the protocals that were broken. Seems to me like a classic ambush on single subject--three points of fire. I am military....been to combat. But, proving any consiracy is difficult. I do think bad things happened.
AnthonydWalsh (December 4, 2008 at 2:09 pm)
The film is genuine, why would the CIA & FBI prevent it from being released for many years? If something walks like a duck, acts like a duck & sounds like a duck, the chances are... it's a duck i.e. the film is genuine.
grassyknollkiller (December 4, 2008 at 12:59 am)
Look at about 0:34. See the people across the street walk backwards over the curb with long strides.
Normal people do not walk backwards with long strides over a curb. They dont want to stumble and hurt themselves. People normally turn around to see where the curb is.
Because the film was resized, spliced, diced, and heavily edited by CIA affiliates, that part of the composite overlay was run backwards.

And the ejecta "blood" on the head was edited in. Z film is an edited fraud.
stupidlisagarbagefac (December 3, 2008 at 3:39 pm)
I completely agree.
I read it cover to cover (impressive, since it's 1600+ pages) and it debunks ALL the conspiracy theories.
karlakor (December 3, 2008 at 12:54 pm)
The most exhaustive and intelligent discussion of the assassination can be found in Vincent Bugliosi's book "Reclaiming History". I believe that anyone who reads it and still remains convinced that anyone but Oswald shot at Kennedy simply isn't interested in the truth.