Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis

Back


Photo image expert, Dr. David Groves, concludes that the Apollo 11 photos allegedly taken on the moon were staged.


In an attempt to disprove our own additional lighting hypothesis, the authors went to Quantec Image Processing-UK which tested a number of NASA photos from Apollo 11. Founder, David Groves:
PhD - BSc (Hons) Class I/Applied Physics.
PhD in Holographic Computer Measurement.
Chartered Physicist and a Member of the Insitute of Physics.

Channel: Film & Animation
Uploaded: April 26, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Author: 1967jrewing

Length: 00:09:59
Rating: 4.06
Views: 92697

Tags: apollo moon hoax

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
astroroadshow (December 5, 2008 at 4:46 am)
I think you are getting 'facts' mixed up with opinions. You have only expressed opinions so far, not a single fact.
12GaugeMonster (December 5, 2008 at 4:01 am)
Worthless to argue with. Facts are there, but stay in your own world. You have the right to believe what in whatever you want to.
astroroadshow (December 5, 2008 at 3:49 am)
'Purpose of THE MOON LANDING was to make enough money to make a space program that can put nukes up in orbit.' ??? So if this is correct why wasn't the nukes put into orbit? You don't need such a moon program to do that anyway. Also nukes in orbit isn't much use. because most of their orbit will take them across the oceans & countries other than Russia. Launching them from the ground where the course is permanently fixed is simpler and more reliable. Important for a nuclear strike.
astroroadshow (December 5, 2008 at 3:34 am)
'Russian KGB (russian version of the cia) knew in two hours of the first moon landing photos being publicly released that those photos were doctored.' ??? Where did you get this from? Secondly - why didn't they act upon it? A statement publicly anouncing this would have been a great victory over the US without costing billions of Rubles. How come the Ruskies confirmed the US moon rocks being genuine when they got there samples years later and didn't reveal a hoax? Think People!
astroroadshow (December 5, 2008 at 3:29 am)
Ahem - I am a Physicist too. You can purchase Dr / Degree certificates on the net. They way this guy talks & the ways he goes about his analysis makes me suspect his qualifications. He should now get a picture of yours taken in broad daylight on Earth and examine that pic in the same way. A real Dr of Physics would have done that. He will probably conclude that there are different light sources there too.
12GaugeMonster (December 5, 2008 at 1:09 am)
The title says he's a Physicist. Plus, a Holographic computer image analyst. With a Masters Degree that's his name starts with Dr.; Not because he has a MD in medicine. And he is nalyzing images.... You are ignorant, this is a prime example of stupidity. Trying to mislabel the mans profession and background. He is the perfect guy to ask outside of NASA's employees like "mythbusters" ect; Watch their youtube videos, they'll crack you up. Then you see a lil more light to luminate your brain.
12GaugeMonster (December 5, 2008 at 12:59 am)
Russian KGB (russian version of the cia) knew in two hours of the first moon landing photos being publicly released that those photos were doctored. They didnt bother looking in on it, they went back to their gun mentality. Purpose of THE MOON LANDING was to make enough money to make a space program that can put nukes up in orbit. Why u think Kennedy mentioned it, IT WAS THE CLIMAX OF THE COLD WAR. Like the naval blockade of russian ships going to Cuba, again Kennedy was president. Think people.
astroroadshow (December 4, 2008 at 3:16 pm)
Don't forget that this guy above is supposed to be an expert on Holograms. Holograms are not real pictures, just virtual ones made from models... so is his anlysis. Some would take it with a pinch of salt.. I would take it with an entire salt mine! NONE of the pics are fake - just this Groves guy trying to promote his business.
Brasker (December 4, 2008 at 3:51 am)
well there are enough proves that make you think the hole thing wasn't as real as they said it was. For anyone who thinks about it for a second, it's highly probable some of the photos are fake, not taken in the moon, the same with the videos.

it wouldn't be the first time something of this magnitude is fake by the way...
inuk2600 (December 4, 2008 at 12:48 am)
Hokay, the picture of the descent module with the shiny golden foil is an easy one. The exposure is set high enough that some areas of the lunar surface (reflectivity of 7%) is blown out. It is no surprise that the foil is reflecting so much from the dark side, as well as the white details. That white piece of equipment is lit so well because it is facing some golden foil on the hot side, not the camera side. I swear these scientists need to go back to school.