Penn & Teller - 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Back



Penn & Teller Bullshit! - 9/11 Conspiracy Theories



Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: February 28, 2007 at 3:33 am
Author: MediaMayhem

Length: 00:09:08
Rating: 3.65
Views: 1107514

Tags: conspiracy theories 911 9/11 conspiracies theory pentagon wtc trade center attack government coverup Bizarre Events Bush

Embed Code: Paste this code in your page


Video Comments:
jmh423 (December 1, 2008 at 10:34 pm)
It is comical that after 3 years and 20-30 phony user IDs that Sharky will still post what everyone here knows is total bullshit like:...."FDNY, the NYPD and the NYPA Police because they were onscene & none of them saw any demolitionists, nor did they see nor mention anything literal about explosives being there that day. Only people with sick fantasies believe otherwise."

Youtube:"9/11 Firefighter Oral Histories, First-Hand Reports"

All sick fantasies no doubt. Lying POS!!
katyu16 (December 1, 2008 at 9:37 pm)
aguilarsrv: Youtube "seven is exploding" and watch it to the very end. You'll clearly hear BOMBS going off in rapid sucsession. Ppl inside WTC7 were blasted by explosions BEFORE the first WTC collapse hit their bldg.
aguilarsrv (December 1, 2008 at 9:45 pm)
hey, i'm more than likely with you bro, but you have to hear both sides before you come to a conclusion. personally, i don't trust this country and that's why i don't believe what it's telling me. this country has enslaved people for over 400 years, it has committed genocides here and elsewhere along with many other atrocities. all this other stuff is just icing on the pile of bullshit the rest of this country has given everyone else.
Sharky2055 (December 1, 2008 at 10:09 pm)
Other countries have committed genocide and ensalved people as well. Brazil had 4 times as many slaves as the US did.

If you believe that WTC 1-2 or were blasted with explosives you may as well accuse the FDNY, the NYPD and the NYPA Police because they were onscene & none of them saw any demolitionists, nor did they see nor mention anything literal about explosives being there that day. Only people with sick fantasies believe otherwise.
katyu16 (December 1, 2008 at 9:35 pm)
aguilarsrv: "what about the verticle beams that help support?" Yeah, what about the CORE? Why and how did WTC 7 fall when the collapse initiation started at the OPPOSITE side of the corner damage? I acknowledge that bldg 7 was severely damaged but how could the penthouse on the other side of the bdlg collapse first then the bldg come down EXACTLY like a controlled demo? Using science like Sharky claims she does explains NOTHING about bldg 7. Even the 9/11 Ommission Rept is quiet on this one.
Sharky2055 (December 1, 2008 at 9:35 pm)
aguilarsrv

Consult the NIST report.
katyu16 (December 1, 2008 at 9:42 pm)
The NIST Rept? John Gross? don't make me laugh. This dude denies molten pools of metal found under all 3 bldgs even when there is vid evidence proving it. Didn't NIST test a life-size model of the WTC floor with flames and it didn't soften or weaken enough to fall? If it's anything like the 9/11 Commission Report I wouldn't trust it as far as I could throw it.
aguilarsrv (December 1, 2008 at 9:47 pm)
also, are you a christian?
Sharky2055 (December 1, 2008 at 9:33 pm)
aguilarsrv

The Pentagon's surveilance is set up to watch over pedestrian and land vehicle traffic, NOT incoming 757's. Air traffic is taken care of by the military & ATC. All the buildings came down due to fire. The towers couldn't comphensate for all the jetfuel which acted as an accellerant, burned at extreme temps sostening thereby weakening the steel. WTC 7 has been explained by NIST. If you think that was an inside job then you may as well accuse the FDNY becuz they were there onscene.
aguilarsrv (December 1, 2008 at 9:40 pm)
do you have a specific link you can send me to for this?