Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing
BackThis video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed.
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: February 23, 2007 at 1:29 pm
Author: ravious260
Length: 00:10:01
Rating: 3.75
Views: 1424581
Tags: SPACE EARTH SCIENCE HISTORY CONSPIRACY BUSH WAR ADULT KNOW THESE WORD ARE NOT IN HERE BUT THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT
Video Comments:
polywoly15 (December 2, 2008 at 9:05 pm)
all this scientific talk that i have no idea about... anyways so how does accepting your theory violate all the scientific laws? examples?
benthedragon (December 2, 2008 at 8:46 pm)
what do you mean by balance?
placed uniformly in all location?
gasses do that all the time by themselve.
measure the mass?
increasing the pressure does increase the mass. how do you think they fill propane tanks?
just because you don't know, doesn't mean no one knows. but let me educate you, to figure it out by using math
p=F/A where p is pressure F is normal force and A is area
placed uniformly in all location?
gasses do that all the time by themselve.
measure the mass?
increasing the pressure does increase the mass. how do you think they fill propane tanks?
just because you don't know, doesn't mean no one knows. but let me educate you, to figure it out by using math
p=F/A where p is pressure F is normal force and A is area
Diamonddavej (December 2, 2008 at 8:03 pm)
Neal, On last note, Sir Edmund Hally wrote in 1683.
"..we have adventured to make the Earth hollow & to place another Globe within it: & I doubt not but this will find Opposers enough.
I know twill be objected, That there is no Instance in Nature of the like thing; That if there was such a middle Globe it would not keep its place in the Centre, but be apt to deviate therefrom, & might possibly chock against the concave Shell, to the ruine or at least endammaging thereof"
So no Hollow Earth!
"..we have adventured to make the Earth hollow & to place another Globe within it: & I doubt not but this will find Opposers enough.
I know twill be objected, That there is no Instance in Nature of the like thing; That if there was such a middle Globe it would not keep its place in the Centre, but be apt to deviate therefrom, & might possibly chock against the concave Shell, to the ruine or at least endammaging thereof"
So no Hollow Earth!
Diamonddavej (December 2, 2008 at 7:17 pm)
Nea; Now I understand. Because the crust is iron rich, you take this as evidence that the core is iron poor!
But the inner & outer core density is 9.9 to 12.5 grams cm3, what else but iron could be that dense.
Anyway, I already told you about Iron meteorites, which represent the cores of asteroids - an Earth with an Iron core fits both the seismic data and structure of the asteroids.
You must base your reasoning on actual facts/measurements, not random speculations.
But the inner & outer core density is 9.9 to 12.5 grams cm3, what else but iron could be that dense.
Anyway, I already told you about Iron meteorites, which represent the cores of asteroids - an Earth with an Iron core fits both the seismic data and structure of the asteroids.
You must base your reasoning on actual facts/measurements, not random speculations.
Diamonddavej (December 2, 2008 at 7:09 pm)
neal; "Why do we have IRON UP HERE?"
How about Iron Meteorites. The core formed, but the surface was kept rich in Iron by the continued addition of Iron from Meteorites, does that sound like a good Idea?
There was a period of intense meteorite bombardment, ~3.8 billion years ago.
Anyway, what's the point about the crust containing Iron?
How about Iron Meteorites. The core formed, but the surface was kept rich in Iron by the continued addition of Iron from Meteorites, does that sound like a good Idea?
There was a period of intense meteorite bombardment, ~3.8 billion years ago.
Anyway, what's the point about the crust containing Iron?
MorituriMax (December 2, 2008 at 7:02 pm)
So, accroding to neal, big bang is magic. even with all the evidence to support it.
Prime Matter Atoms are NOT magic, even with NO evidence to support them.
Something smells very fishy about how neal defines magic.
Prime Matter Atoms are NOT magic, even with NO evidence to support them.
Something smells very fishy about how neal defines magic.
nealadamsdotcom (December 2, 2008 at 7:00 pm)
Diamonddave, You know dave, in some ways, guys in the past were not so stupid. Many spoke of AETHER. Hell, they all did, till a couple of experiments shot it down. Now we are faced with Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Sounds like aether to me. I'm behind the times? I'll take that as a complement.
nealadamsdotcom (December 2, 2008 at 6:51 pm)
Diamonddave, I'm NOT saying "NO PRESSURE" In fact what ever pressure there is , a greater pressure must push outward. pressure is distributed. Think of an airliner's tire. "SIMPLE" air pressure holds up tens of tons of plane. How? No place for the pressure to go.
How do we find the PRESSURE? I don't know. Not by math. You can't balance the pressure.
Then we have THE MOLTEN IRON Theory. Iron as a liquid?
Brings us to the acretionary theory. Iron Core. Why do we have IRON UP HERE?
How do we find the PRESSURE? I don't know. Not by math. You can't balance the pressure.
Then we have THE MOLTEN IRON Theory. Iron as a liquid?
Brings us to the acretionary theory. Iron Core. Why do we have IRON UP HERE?
nealadamsdotcom (December 2, 2008 at 6:33 pm)
ofnem, Assume NO MAGIC. Assume no Big Bang, what ever your interpretation of it is.
Assume matter is made beginning with Pair-Production and processing up to high count atoms then through collecting Hydrogen suns. From there we collect ions on EM lines to build Higher count atoms which structure into Meteorites.
Meteorites collect from internal and external accretion, ON the sun's electro-magnetic lines.
As the sun grows, the guiding lines move outward. The growing planets move outward
Assume matter is made beginning with Pair-Production and processing up to high count atoms then through collecting Hydrogen suns. From there we collect ions on EM lines to build Higher count atoms which structure into Meteorites.
Meteorites collect from internal and external accretion, ON the sun's electro-magnetic lines.
As the sun grows, the guiding lines move outward. The growing planets move outward
Diamonddavej (December 2, 2008 at 6:26 pm)
Neal; I find it interesting that your view of the geology of the Earth is so similar to Thomas Burnets Sacred Theory of the Earth of 1684.
In Sacred Theory of the Earth, Burnet wrote that "Earth is an egg, with the planetary crust as its perfect shell and the
watery interior abyss as the yolk"
Finny how a guy in the 1684 used an egg to understand the interior of Earth like you use coconuts, you're so behind the times Neal, by 324 years.
In Sacred Theory of the Earth, Burnet wrote that "Earth is an egg, with the planetary crust as its perfect shell and the
watery interior abyss as the yolk"
Finny how a guy in the 1684 used an egg to understand the interior of Earth like you use coconuts, you're so behind the times Neal, by 324 years.
- Soundbiters | Comment on Political Video
-
Tags:
Politics Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Chris Dodd John Edwards Mike Gravel Dennis Kucinich Barack Obama Bill Richardson Sam Brownback Rudy Giuliani Mike Huckabee Duncan Hunter John McCain Ron Paul Mitt Romney Tom Tancredo Tommy Thompson Fred Thompson Rush Limbaugh Mark Levin Laura Ingraham Sean Hannity Monica Crowley Bob Grant Bill O'Reilly Michael Medved Glenn Beck G. Gordon Liddy Matt Drudge Bill Bennett Neal Boortz Alan Colmes Al Sharpton Randi Rhodes Hugh Hewitt Al Franken Republican Democrat Libertarian George Bush Political Scandal
-